When we talk about the health of our planet, we usually think forests or oceans, which are naturally massive ecosystems, crucial for the livelihood and survival of the planet. However, what often gets overlooked is soil and its health. In the European Union, 95% of food comes from soil, and 60-70% of our soil is unhealthy. If you speak the language of money, €50 billion is lost every year because of soil degradation, due to reduced crop yield or damage to the infrastructure. 

Besides directly being the source of food production, it also helps control the rain, snowmelt and irrigation water flow. The minerals present in soil are essential for filtering and immobilizing organic and inorganic materials. Soil also facilitates the cycle of nutrients and naturally stores CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Soil is, just like the ocean, a home of a great variety of diverse species.

This year in Slovakia, researchers looked at spiders, who are the natural predators and thus regulators of pests. They found out that ecological agriculture led to higher populations and diversity of kinds of spiders. In the soils in the “common” agriculture, there are less species and they are characterised by their skill to survive in the invasive agricultural interventions of the soil. The result was, that diversity in managing soil in agriculture has a significant impact on the biodiversity in the ecosystem, with indicators such as the researched spiders.

As in many instances, the gatekeeping of knowledge does not leave the scientific publications and financial estimates which are either not accessible to the general public, or they are simply not written in a way that is practically applicable. Sometimes, innovative technologies look good on paper, but not in real life settings. Then, farmers attempting at more sustainable solutions are left in the dark about what their options are. 

Interview with Ing. Darina Štyriaková, PhD., a founder and CEO of Ekolive

Darina Štyriaková, the founder and CEO of Ekolive spoke to PulseZ about  their approach and technology to revive soil. She graduated in Geological Engineering at the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, in Košice, Slovakia, holding a PhD in Biotechnologies from Slovak Academy of Sciences under head of Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling. She spent over 15 years on researching biomining, bioremediation and biotreatment of materials. Currently, Darina represents Slovakia as a Soil Mission Ambassador for the European Commission’s Mission Soil Platform and a member of Towards zer0 Pesticide AGRIculture: European Network for sustainability.

What do you see as the most urgent problem in agriculture in Slovakia or Europe?

Not only in Slovakia, not only in Europe, but worldwide: I see the biggest problem in the fact that for almost 100 years we have systematically destroyed our soils, our livelihoods, through the excessive use of agrochemicals, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides. 

Worldwide, depending on the continent, we are talking about degraded soils ranging from 40 to over 60 % – in Europe, it is 62%, and of that, 89% is agricultural land. The result: a destroyed soil microbiome, declining yields, diseased and unresistant plants, unhealthy products, sick animals, and sick people. Furthermore, in developing countries, especially in Africa, there is an inadequate supply of food, hunger, and countries in increasing debt. The import of agrochemicals is one of the biggest factors in these countries’ negative trade balances. It’s all interconnected.

In Europe, on the other hand, we have the problem that many soils are overfertilized. Not to mention that many soils actually already contain sufficient elements for fertilization. But the plants grown on them don’t absorb them. Why? Because the soil microbiome is damaged by the excessive use of agrochemicals, and only the microbiome makes the active ingredients available to plants.

And what are the consequences – both in Africa and in Europe, and everywhere else: more and more use of agrochemicals, more and more destroyed and poisoned soils – it’s a vicious circle. We urgently need to get out of this. That’s why at ekolive we talk about a “reboot of the system.”

What do they do at Ekolive?

Their main innovation technology is called InnoBioTech, which is big news in bioleaching. Never heard this term? It is a technique used to extract minerals from ores and mining waste by using bacteria. It is a new way of finding eco-efficient alternatives for managing contaminated soil. The technology uses the natural process of soil formation through microbial weathering of minerals. It recycles low-grade primary minerals and recycles secondary minerals. At Ekolive, they also collaborate with food production companies to optimize management of soil to maintain its health.

What is the difference between different types of fertilizers? Do you classify your product as a fertilizer?

Basically, there are two categories for classifying agricultural aids: fertilizers and pesticides (also known as plant protection products). Whether chemical or organic, every product must be classified into one of the two main categories. This has consequences for the products’ claimed effects: A product in the fertilizer category may not claim any direct effects from the pesticide category – and vice versa. 

Pesticides are also subject to strict storage and trading regulations. Within the fertilizer category, in which we have registered our products in all countries where we are active, there are – depending on the country – a whole range of subcategories: mineral, organic, complete fertilizers, plant strengtheners, adjuvants, etc. 

In addition, in a few countries, there is also the category of biostimulants. This category also exists at the EU level according to the “new” (2019) EU Fertilizer Regulation. According to the definition set out therein, our products would fit into this category like almost no other product on the market – apart from the fact that biostimulants, in the true sense of the term, have stimulating effects on plants, both in terms of plant growth and yield and in terms of the systemic resilience of plants against diseases and pathogens – and thus, in terms of their indirect effects, they actually fall somewhere between the two categories of fertilizers and pesticides. 

However, due to the strong lobbying of the major players who dominate the market and thus define the market, this EU regulation also requires that biostimulants can only claim effects in the fertilizer sector.

We have to approve our products according to national regulations in the individual countries. In the EU, the general rule of mutual recognition of an approval in an EU country applies – unfortunately, this is not implemented in all countries in the fertilizer sector. 

Is your product intended for degraded soil? Or can it also be used on healthy soil?

Our products are soil, plant health and growth enhancers. We want to make it clear that these are products that stimulate both the soil and the plants growing on it, in a variety of ways. And, of course, this happens on or in healthy soil as well as in degraded soil. Our products can be used in any type of agriculture, conventional, organic, or regenerative.

Of course, they have different or varying degrees of effect depending on the soil or soil quality on which they are used. But they work everywhere. The most astonishing effects, however, are seen when used on the poorest soils: in Africa, we see increases in yields of various crops of 50 to 400%! This is because the soils there are consistently in a deplorable state.

Can you describe the process of regenerating degraded soils and how long such a process takes?

Here, we need to differentiate a little regarding the definition of degraded soils.

Firstly, we are talking about agricultural land that has been degraded for a variety of reasons and to varying degrees. These are generally soils where the microbiome has been destroyed by the excessive use of agrochemicals and therefore no longer functions or functions inadequately. 

This results in the consequences for the plants mentioned above. But the soil structure also changes: the soils harden, dry out, become impermeable, no longer retain moisture, erode, and biodiversity declines drastically. Of course, there are other causes for this, too, such as soil compaction due to the use of machinery, deforestation and subsequent erosion, and much more. 

Many soils are also simply contaminated by the excessive use of agrochemicals, and this eventually seeps into the groundwater. By using our products, this can be changed and healed: the microbiome is reactivated and begins to interact again in symbiosis with the soil and the plants growing on it. This not only stimulates the plants, but also changes the soil itself. It changes its structure, becomes porous again, allows water to permeate and can store it. CO2 from the air is captured and stored in the soil as humus, and nitrates are also bound in the soil. Biodiversity increases. Organic pollutants (from agrochemicals) are broken down. 

This doesn’t happen overnight; it takes time, depending on the degree of degradation of the soil in question. However, the development can be tracked quite quickly and, above all, is quickly visible on the plants.

Furthermore, degraded soils also include industrially contaminated sites that are organically (e.g., with mineral oils) or inorganically (usually with so-called heavy metals), or even both. If the contaminants are “only” organic, we can use our bioleaching technology – InnoBioTech® – to remove them in-situ, i.e., on-site in their “built-in” state. Depending on the type and severity of the contamination, the bacteria need a few weeks to do this, or in the worst case, 1-2 years or more. However, if the contaminants are inorganic, the contaminated soil usually has to be dredged and treated with bacteria on a secure site, either in a heap or in a tank. This is because the bacteria do not remove the heavy metals, but dissolve them. And they would then enter the groundwater in-situ. This also takes varying amounts of time, but in most cases, we are talking only weeks.

Which part of the process for obtaining the “EU Environmental Technology Verification (ETV)” was the most challenging for you, and what practical benefits did this award bring you?

“Challenging” is certainly the wrong word. We applied for this certification; it was advertised at the time by EIT RawMaterials, an arm of the EIT – European Institute for Innovation and Technology. And we were fortunate enough to be selected. The next step was to convince the responsible laboratory or certification body of our process… but then it was quite straightforward and quick.

The ETV award wasn’t given out often. In our category, we were one of perhaps only 15 companies in the EU to receive this certificate – and we are very happy and grateful for that. This certificate is like a seal of quality for our technology and the products based on it. It makes us unique and builds trust with customers and partners. And in many cases, it has already helped us overcome one or another hurdle, be it with approvals, registrations or project applications.

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.