Tell EU stories, develop your journalism skills, and make your voice heard!

The Transition Isn’t an Epiphany — It’s a Power Shift

Folks are always talking about the shift to new energy sources like it’s some kind of ethical epiphany, while the whole planet suddenly agreed to ditch oil and gas and just stroll, nice and easy, into a brighter, greener tomorrow.

But if you look beyond all the talking and the official announcements, a different picture starts to emerge.

This whole energy shift is definitely happening, but it’s not about taking power away from anyone.

It’s more about shuffling it around.

The Numbers Don’t Match the Narrative

Even though everyone’s talking about “green” energy, the world’s actual energy needs are telling a different story. Global oil use is still over 100 million barrels daily, and big oil companies and market watchers think it’ll stay that high, or even higher, until at least the mid-2030s. Even the International Energy Agency sees oil demand going up in the near future, not just from cars, but from factories, plastics production, shipping, and even making electricity.

Meanwhile, the world’s need for electricity is also skyrocketing. Just data centers now use about 1.5% of all the electricity we use globally, and that number is expected to more than double by 2030 as artificial intelligence becomes more widespread. AI needs a lot of power to run, not just hopes and dreams. It requires continuous, dependable, large-scale electricity.

While renewable energy sources are growing fast, they aren’t yet expanding quickly enough or reliably enough to handle this massive increase all by themselves. And when dependability is the main concern, countries tend to rely on what they know works.

That means natural gas and oil and using the infrastructure that’s already in place.

These Countries Are Examples — Not Exceptions

Iran, Venezuela, and Greenland aren’t the only places facing these kinds of issues.

They’re actually just showing us a bigger picture of what’s happening around the world.

Everywhere, governments are taking a closer look at how they’ll keep their energy safe, how goods will get to them, and how much they need to keep in stock. Whether it’s Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, Central Asia, or the Arctic, people are still very much looking for oil, gas, and other important resources. It’s just that now, they’re being pickier about it, it’s more about politics, and they’re not really apologizing for it anymore.

Those three examples just make it easier to see what’s going on.

Iran: Control Without Production Dominance – Geography as Leverage

It’s not just about how much energy Iran pumps out, but where all the world’s energy has to flow through that makes it important.

Around 20 million barrels of oil daily, which is about a fifth of what the world uses, have to go through the Strait of Hormuz. This tight spot basically gives Iran a bargaining chip. Just one hiccup, or even the idea of one, can really mess with markets and send prices soaring.

This is basically using energy as a way to apply pressure. You don’t even need to stop the oil flow for this to work – just creating doubt is enough.

Even with sanctions, Iran is still a big player in the energy scene. It’s just that its influence is being shown in different ways now.

Venezuela: Abundance Without Access – Reserves Don’t Automatically Mean Power

Venezuela teaches us a different kind of lesson. It’s sitting on about 300 billion barrels of confirmed oil reserves, which is about 17% of all the oil in the world. Yet, it barely produces any of it.

What really hurts is the crumbling infrastructure, the sanctions, and being shut out politically, not what the ground has to offer.

Even so, every time the world’s oil supply gets a bit tight, Venezuela pops back into the spotlight. One can see permits getting tweaked and political talk becoming a bit friendlier. When the market feels the squeeze, energy has this knack for making people bend their rules.

It really hammers home a tough truth: just having energy doesn’t give you power – it’s all about being able to control how it gets into the global marketplace.

Greenland: When the Transition Melts the Map – The Arctic Becomes Strategic

Greenland used to be seen mostly as a symbol of climate change, but now it’s becoming a place of strategic importance.

With Arctic ice melting and sea ice significantly lower than usual, new shipping lanes and access to resources are opening up. Underneath the ice, there are valuable minerals, rare earth elements, and important geographic features that are crucial for things like electric vehicles, batteries, and power grids.

It’s kind of funny that the climate crisis is actually making it easier to get these resources.

Even though Greenland has stopped looking for oil and gas, it’s now a key player in the competition for the minerals needed for the technologies that are supposed to help us transition to a greener future. This green future isn’t separate from global politics; it’s actually deeply involved in it.

The Pattern Beneath the Transition

All these situations together highlight the big problem with how we’re trying to switch to new energy sources.

We’re not just swapping out old fuels for new ones. Instead, we’re kind of stuck in the middle, still needing oil and gas a lot while we’re building up the new renewable systems alongside them.

That’s why oil prices are still extremely unstable when there’s trouble in the world. This is why we’re still building more gas pipelines and facilities. And it’s why places that have a lot of energy resources keep becoming important again, no matter what politicians say.

This whole energy shift ends up benefiting the people who are already in a strong position and it’s tough for those who thought everyone would stop using so much energy so quickly.

Why This Matters? 

For our generation, this is important because we’re stepping into a system that’s sending mixed signals.

We hear that the future is supposed to be eco-friendly, and that’s definitely a possibility. However, the way things run now still heavily relies on oil, gas, and where resources are located.

Grasping this isn’t about being negative; it’s about seeing things clearly.

The shift to a greener future is going to happen.

But it won’t be won by people with catchy phrases or good intentions alone.

It will be won by those who control the energy sources while the world still depends on them.

Right now, who owns that energy is having a much bigger impact on global power than any talk about the transition ever lets on.

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.