The German-born American psychoanalyst and social philosopher Erich Fromm describes it as one of the three forms of what he calls the syndrome of decay. The core problem with narcissism, Fromm argues, is that narcissists are entirely unable to perceive reality outside of themselves, and it is precisely this detachment that makes it so destructive. According to Fromm, numerous factors can lead to an individual’s decay, but fundamentally, all people initially strive to “overcome life.” They do this in one of two ways: through biophilia – derived from the Greek bio (life) and philia (friendly love), or through necrophilia, from necro (death) and philia.
Biophilia embraces life, while necrophilia denies it, but both serve as coping mechanisms for the challenges of existence. Narcissism, Fromm suggests, emerges as a secondary mechanism, leaning toward the necrophilic path. Why? Because it is not life-affirming, intensely individualistic and egotistical, whereas humans are inherently social beings. However, being detached from reality does not prevent narcissists from adapting; they often conceal their disinterest in communal life and can even form groups.
“The highly narcissistic group is eager to have a leader with whom it can identify. The leader is then admired by the group, which projects its narcissism onto him… The narcissism of the individual is transferred onto the leader.” The irony is that narcissists are rarely in love with themselves. More often, their self-esteem is tied to a collective identity-nation, race, religion, or ideology-because deep down, they feel inadequate. Belonging to a group grants them significance, and they are willing to defend this perceived status at all costs. The result? Radicalism.
Yet, not all members of a radical movement are necessarily narcissists; the statistics would not align. The crucial factor is that the group itself functions narcissistically, a tendency Fromm describes as socially transmitted. Humans need to belong, especially during economic hardship or periods of low self-esteem. Leaders who wish to manage collective dissatisfaction can do so most effectively by providing the group with a narcissistic object-someone or something to admire and identify with.
History offers numerous examples of narcissistic groups – nations, political movements, and rebel factions – often radicalized and consumed by their mission. But what happens when someone challenges their ideology? Repression and violence happen. The Reign of Terror happens. Genocide in Armenia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and Cambodia happen. Blacklists of writers, actors, and directors happen. The assassination of leaders and thinkers such as Caesar, Socrates, Trotsky, and Navalny happens. The Holocaust happens.
