But EU rules show that bringing your pet on holiday is more than a casual decision: it requires a passport, paperwork, and a good understanding of the law.
EU regulations on pet mobility are designed to make life easier for citizens and their furry friends. In reality, though, they often raise questions — and sometimes even frustration over too much red tape.
A pet passport in the EU is not a cute keepsake from the vet — it’s a valid travel document required at borders. It contains your pet’s identification details (including microchip or tattoo number), vaccination history against rabies, and the veterinarian’s credentials.
Only an authorised vet can issue the passport. While this reduces the risk of fraud, it can be tricky to find a qualified vet in smaller towns or rural areas.
The key requirement, both for EU travel and when entering from outside, is a valid rabies vaccination. While this makes perfect sense for public health, the strict deadlines can be inconvenient — especially if you need to travel unexpectedly.
And if you’re heading to countries recognised as free from the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis — such as Finland, Ireland, Malta, Norway, or Northern Ireland — you’ll also need proof of deworming. The rule is meant to protect ecosystems but adds yet another formality (and cost) for pet owners.
Brexit changed the rules for UK travellers. Since 2021, pet passports issued in the UK are no longer valid when entering the EU or Northern Ireland. Pet owners from Britain now face the same conditions as travellers from non-EU countries — meaning more paperwork and longer preparation times.
This strict separation of documents raises questions. After all, the health requirements remain very similar. Many see the shift less as a health precaution and more as a political side effect of Brexit negotiations.
Despite its name, the “EU Pet Passport” doesn’t apply to all pets. Only dogs, cats, and ferrets are covered. Owners of birds, rabbits, rodents, or reptiles need to check the rules of the destination country each time they travel.
This lack of uniform rules for other species creates uncertainty. Sometimes, exotic pet owners only learn about restrictions at the border — and in the worst-case scenario, their pet may be denied entry.
For those travelling with less common pets, this means contacting embassies or consulates well in advance. In today’s EU, with free movement as a guiding principle, this feels outdated.
If you’re travelling to the EU from a non-EU country, you’ll need an EU Animal Health Certificate. This official document is issued by a state veterinarian in your home country and must be dated no more than 10 days before entry. It also requires a written statement confirming the pet is not being transported for commercial purposes.
From a health perspective, the short validity makes sense. But in practice, it complicates travel: if your plans change or your trip is delayed, you may have to start the whole process again.
With mobility increasing and multi-leg trips becoming common, many argue the certificate should remain valid for longer — as long as vaccinations are up to date.
EU law allows you to travel with up to five pets. Exceeding this limit is only possible if you prove they’re participating in a competition, exhibition, or sporting event — and they must be at least six months old.
The idea is to prevent people from transporting large numbers of animals under the disguise of “private travel.”
But the rule feels restrictive in practice. For large families or hobby breeders wanting to take their animals on holiday, the limit can block plans. On the other hand, lifting the rule could increase illegal pet trade risks. The real issue is that the law doesn’t distinguish enough between genuine private owners and those acting commercially.
If you can’t travel with your pet, EU rules allow someone else to do it — if they have your written consent. However, you must be reunited with your pet within five days.
While the rule ensures the trip isn’t for commercial purposes, it can be impractical. For longer business trips or unexpected issues, the five-day window is often too short.
A more flexible system — allowing exceptions with proper documentation — would better reflect real-life situations. Right now, the law treats all cases the same, regardless of context or risk.
EU pet travel rules aim to protect both people and animals by preventing the spread of dangerous diseases. In many ways, they succeed — rabies is now extremely rare within the EU.
But this safety comes at the cost of a complex system of rules and restrictions. For today’s highly mobile citizens, this raises a question: should the EU stick to rigid rules, or move towards a more flexible system that balances public health with the freedom to travel?
Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.
