You open social media and start scrolling through stories. The first story is a friend’s vacation photo. The next one shows a natural disaster somewhere in the world. Then you stumble upon footage from a war zone, genocide, and many dead bodies. Before you even have time to process what you just saw, the next post appears, and you see another joke, meme, or an ordinary moment from someone’s day.

As digital technologies become increasingly embedded in everyday life, researchers are paying closer attention to the relationship between technological environments and human behavior. Despite all the advantages of technology, including long-distance communication and fast access to information, some scholars warn that excessive reliance on the digital world may have consequences. In this constant flow of information, empathy becomes one of the first casualties.

What is empathy?

Empathy is a complex cognitive ability that plays a paramount role in human relationships. However, developing and expressing empathy and compassion is not always immediate or effortless. Genuine empathy requires time and, most importantly, the ability to pause and engage with another person’s suffering. But when tragedy appears in the same space as entertainment and disappears with a simple swipe, our capacity to respond to the pain of others begins to erode. This concern is supported by research: a long-term study found that levels of empathetic concern significantly declined over a thirty-year period as exposure to digital technologies steadily increased (Konrath et al., 2011).

Why screens make empathy harder

One of the reasons lies in how digital communication changes the way we perceive emotions. Much of human empathy depends on subtle cues, such as facial expressions, body language, tone of voice, and eye contact. These signals help us interpret emotions and respond appropriately. Neuroscience also highlights the importance of “mirror neurons,” brain cells that activate when we observe another person’s emotions. These neurons allow us to “mirror” the emotional state of others, which explains why sometimes watching someone cry can make us tear up as well. However, studies suggest that prolonged digital communication may weaken these processes. The modern-day phenomenon known as “phubbing” (the act of ignoring someone in favor of checking a smartphone) shows how digital habits can disrupt our empathetic reaction during conversations. When a person repeatedly shifts their focus to their gadget, it becomes harder to remain fully present. Subsequently, the level of attentiveness decreases. Especially for younger generations who have grown up with constant access to digital spaces, phubbing may be particularly significant. If digital interruptions become normalized in everyday interactions, sustained attention may gradually become less common in social life.

“Psychic numbing” and the limits of empathy

At the same time, constant exposure to online content related to suffering can lead to apathy and inaction from the side of individuals, which is not surprising at all. When Internet users encounter repeated images of massacres and violence, their emotional systems may become overwhelmed. This phenomenon was described by Paul Slovic, who observed that empathy often decreases as the number of victims increases. As he explains:

“A single child fallen down a well or dying of starvation stirs our hearts and moves our hands (and wallets) to action. Yet as soon as the number of victims increases to two, compassion—both affective and behavioral—begins to wane.”

The reason behind this lies in our brain’s coping mechanism, described as “psychic numbing” or “compassion fatigue.” According to this phenomenon, people tend to react more strongly to the suffering of a single identifiable victim while becoming less responsive as the number of victims increases. Rarely do large numbers of victims in catastrophes evoke the emotional involvement necessary to motivate action, paradoxically causing less compassion than individual stories.

However, it is crucial to mention that a response, or its absence, does not necessarily indicate a lack of care or moral indifference. Instead, it can function as a psychological defense mechanism that helps individuals cope with the constant exposure to distressing content; otherwise, the psychological consequences would be severe. If online users experienced the full intensity of empathy toward every single instance of suffering they encounter on the web, they would soon start suffering from anxiety, stress, depression, and overall emotional exhaustion.

How algorithms amplify disturbing content

The algorithms of digital platforms themselves play a crucial role. Social media environments are not neutral spaces where information simply appears; these ecosystems are designed to maximize engagement. Algorithms prioritize content that provokes strong reactions, such as anger, shock, desperation, anxiety, or fear, simply because these emotions tend to keep users scrolling for longer. Consequently, users often encounter disturbing content they might not have been deliberately seeking. A survey conducted by the Youth Endowment Fund in 2024 revealed that 70% of teenagers were exposed to real-world violence on social media platforms. Among them, 25% reported that the content was algorithmically pushed to them rather than intentionally sought. Over time, exposure to distressing content becomes a routine part of everyday life, leaving a mark on young and developing minds.

How can we restore empathy?

Although digital environments can weaken empathetic responses, this process is not irreversible. Here are three steps that can help restore more compassionate engagement with others:

  • Slow down the consumption of information.

One of the main challenges of digital environments is the speed at which information is consumed. Endless scrolling rarely allows time to process what we see. Taking a moment to pause when encountering distressing posts can help restore the emotional awareness.

  • Focus on individual stories.

Research consistently shows that people respond more strongly to the suffering of identifiable individuals than to statistics. Instead of engaging only with headlines or numbers, try seeking out personal narratives. This way you, first, will approach the urge to get information more mindfully. Secondly, it allows you to foster a deeper sense of compassion, which is much needed nowadays.

  • Rebuild face-to-face interaction.

It is important to remember that empathy develops through real human connection. Eye contact, the interlocutor’s voice, and body language provide signals that digital communication lacks. When spending time with people, minimize distractions such as smartphone notifications. Your interlocutor will appreciate your full engagement in the conversation.

Empathy may be under pressure in the digital age, but it is far from disappearing. In a world flooded with a constant flow of information, it is up to each individual to pause, notice, and, most importantly, to care.

References:

Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395

Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004). “The mirror-neuron system”. Annual Review of Neuroscience27 (1): 169–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Slovic, P. (2007). Psychic numbing and the identifiable victim effect. Judgment and Decision Making.

Youth Endowment Fund. (2024). 70% of teens see real-life violence on social media, reveals new research.
https://youthendowmentfund.org.uk/news/70-of-teens-see-real-life-violence-on-social-media-reveals-new-research/

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.