A new law on media freedom came into force across the European Union on August 8, 2025. Why do we need such a law when media freedom is a given in democratic countries, and what impact will it have on the media and journalists?
Over the past decade, the media in Europe has faced a number of threats. From political pressure and the concentration of media in the hands of a few owners to the rise of disinformation on social media. The Media Freedom Index, compiled annually by Reporters Without Borders (RSF), shows that while Europe still maintains the highest standards globally, the situation has worsened in several member states. For example, Slovakia has fallen nine places in the media freedom ranking compared to last year, Croatia by 12, Romania by six and Hungary by one.
The top five places in the ranking, which includes 180 countries, are dominated by Norway, Estonia, the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. In contrast, the bottom five places this year were occupied by Iran, Syria, China, North Korea and Eritrea. In late October, the organization also published a list of 34 predators of media freedom. “These predators are divided into five categories that are directly derived from the indicators of the Index: political, security, economic, legal and social,” RSF said.
Names such as Vladimir Putin (Russia), Haibatullah Akhundzada (Afghanistan), Alexander Lukashenko (Belarus) and the Chinese Communist Party (China) made it to the list. From EU member states, Viktor Orbán (Hungary), Vincent Bolloré (France) and Robert Fico (Slovakia) appeared on the list. The reasons why the organization included Robert Fico in the ranking include more than 500 attacks on journalists, mostly supported by his party Smer-SSD, and the election to the Media Services Council of an activist who publicly called journalists “soldiers” and “deviants”.
The Government Office of the Slovak Republic also took issue with the claims, strongly rejecting the “pseudo-ranking”. “Such an assessment is all the more absurd given that the same organization remained silent for a long time during attacks by state officials on free media in 2020-2023 and did not respond to specific cases of intimidation or discrediting of journalists with a different opinion,” the government office said on social media.

