The Legal Architecture of Prohibition

In 2025, the Hungarian government did not merely ban a protest; it developed an entire legal arsenal to erase the right of the LGBTQI+ community to exist in public. The constitutional amendment passed in April prohibits public events that “violate the rights of children” thereby stifling any attempt at visibility or political advocacy by LGBTQIA+ groups. At the same time, the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) has been institutionalised as a tool for identifying and targeting citizens who participate in illegal gatherings such as Budapest Pride, with fines reaching 200,000 forints (approximately $546) per participation, revenues which have been announced to be channelled into the state ‘child protection’ mechanism (7); (4).

Beyond the authoritarian nature of this legislation, it is also deeply stigmatising, as Amnesty International Greece stated to European Youth Press:

“The recent anti-Pride law is the latest in a series of measures that target and stigmatise individuals and groups from the LGBTQI+ community and attempt to take away rights that LGBTQI+ people have fought hard to achieve […] It is vital that the Hungarian authorities do not impose unjustified restrictions or a preventive ban on Budapest Pride…” 

Despite proclamations about ‘protecting children,’ the law is an integral part of a broader strategy to criminalise public dissent. Orbán himself, in a speech last February, announced the ban, while the ruling Fidesz (Hungary’s ruling right-wing populist party, led by Viktor Orbán, known for its nationalist, socially conservative, and authoritarian agenda) enacted within a few days the suspension of citizenship for dual nationals considered a ‘threat’ to national sovereignty. The amendment is the 15th in a row since 2011, when Orbán rewrote the Hungarian constitution as he saw fit (7);(1); (8).

Rather than a neutral legal framework, Hungary is building a constitutional showcase of exclusion: where gender is defined only as ‘male’ and ‘female,’ and the right to assemble depends on the government’s blessing (7); (3).

Budapest Pride as a Political Symbol

For three decades, Budapest Pride has been the largest annual public event promoting human rights in Hungary. From a celebration of visibility and equality, it has now become a test of endurance against an authoritarian government. In 2025, instead of a permit, the organisers received a ban. The police invoked recent legislation on ‘child protection’, using it as a cover for censorship. Although liberal mayor Gergely Karasony declared that Pride would take place as a municipal event that did not require a permit, the authorities insisted on the ban. At the same time, the government used provisions on ‘offending the moral development of minors’ as a legal basis for criminalising participation — with fines of up to 200,000 forints (5); (4); (1).

The shift of Pride from a free march to an ‘illegal gathering’ was accompanied by the threat of surveillance through facial recognition technologies, which have now been institutionalised as part of the mechanism of repression. As noted by Amnesty International, whose Greek office also participated in the ‘Let Pride March’ campaign:

“A large number of people are expected to take to the streets peacefully and they must be allowed to demonstrate safely… The parade should continue unhindered and the police response… should be fully in line with human rights”.

Image credit: Yorgos Karagiorgos.

Under no circumstances should the ban on Pride be seen as an exclusively internal political incident, but as a direct challenge to the European legal and moral framework. Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union guarantees freedom of assembly and prohibits discrimination. This year, however, Pride organisers openly state that they are threatened with targeting, violence and financial exhaustion because they insist on taking to the streets. As a spokesperson for the organisation told the AP, the government’s goal is to ‘create scapegoats and silence critics of the regime’ (3); (6); (2). Even so, Pride does not seem to be losing momentum, according to a statement by Katalin Cseh, a member of the Hungarian opposition: The European Commission and council remain hesitant, divided and timid. This is not just a moral failure – it is a strategic one. The EU may be the last functioning democratic project of global scale. And it is being tested. As democratic backsliding accelerates worldwide, Europe faces a simple question: can it defend its own values? Or will it fold? […] If we don’t respond collectively, publicly and decisively, we will wake up to find the authoritarian turn complete (1).

Big Brother in the Square

In Hungary of 2025, freedom is now linked to cameras, new legislation allows the police to use facial recognition technology to identify individuals participating in ‘illegal’ events, such as Budapest Pride. This means that simply attending a demonstration can result in an administrative penalty or, in practice, the creation of an ideological identity file. The use of this technology, previously only permitted for searching for missing persons or criminals, is now being extended to peaceful protesters, under the pretext of protecting children (7); (3); (2).

The logic is clear and dangerous: policing dissent is no longer limited to the physical present but extends to the digital footprint. As Ádám Remport of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) pointed out: “One of the most fundamental problems is its invasiveness, just the sheer scale of the intrusion that happens when you apply mass surveillance to a crowd,” […] “More salient in this case is the effect on the freedom of assembly, specifically the chilling effect that arises when people are scared to go out and show their political or ideological beliefs for fear of being persecuted, (7).

©Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

In this context, the very concept of freedom is distorted. It is not only your body that is banned from the streets – your desire to express yourself is also being monitored. Amnesty International points out that the suppression of Pride and the widespread use of surveillance tools are part of a pattern of violations that strikes at the heart of the right to protest:

“In a report published in July 2024, Amnesty International documented a series of trends and patterns of restrictions and violations of the right to protest in 21 EU countries. Protests have been a powerful tool for change, and it is important to protect them”.

Hungary thus presents a technologically equipped authoritarianism that invests not only in violence but also in intimidation through surveillance. The ban on protest is enforced not with batons but with cameras. And the government’s goal is no longer just to silence – it is to intimidate memory (3); (8).

Europe Responds – or Remains Silent?

When the ban on Budapest Pride became a reality, all eyes turned to Brussels. As guardian of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, one would expect the European Union to intervene immediately. However, the reaction was a familiar pattern: statements of concern, legal ‘examination,’ no immediate action. As Katalin Cseh aptly commented “Brussels is reportedly considering legal action ‘if necessary’, but it has yet to take interim steps to protect this year’s march, now just two months away. Its usual excuse – the need to avoid “political interference” – is no longer viable. Orbán is the one breaking the law – the one wiping his feet on the EU treaties.” (1).

 

Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban with the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels, Belgium, February 3, 2020. © 2020 Isopix/Shutterstock

In practice, the strongest response came not from institutions, but from individuals: Dozens of MEPs, including Greens, Liberals and Socialists, announced that they would participate in the Budapest march on 28 June – not as observers, but as a human shield. ‘Neither love nor freedom can be banned,’ said the city’s mayor, Gergely Karasonyi, calling for Pride to become a municipal event, beyond the scope of state bans (5). Amnesty International Greece, for this part, is clearly calling on European institutions to take legal action without delay:

“The European Commission must act quickly… by requesting interim measures from the European Court of Justice… or by initiating new proceedings on the basis of the recent amendments… So far, it has remained inactive… It is time to break this deadlock” 

However, institutional tools – such as Article 7, which allows for the removal of a Member State’s voting rights – remain inactive. The issue is no longer legal, it is political: the EU is afraid to clash with a leader who openly threatens its unity. And so, the punishment for Hungary becomes administrative – never constitutional (1); (5); (7).

And while the flags of the European Union fly at every embassy that has expressed concern, what remains in the streets of Budapest is uncertainty. If Pride can be banned in Budapest, it can be banned in Zagreb, Warsaw, Rome. Silence becomes precedent. And precedent becomes normality.

Silent Presence, Uninterrupted March

The march that the Orbán government is trying to ban is not just a parade. It is a journey to the very heart of democracy – the right to exist in public, to assert oneself, to not be ashamed of loving. When the state declares love illegal and monitors protests with cameras, it is not just a community that is threatened; it is the very concept of freedom itself.

But no matter how hard they try to silence the voices, they cannot erase the presence. Mass mobilisation, international support and growing resistance show that even when voices are silenced, the march continues. Without shouting, but with determination. Without permission, but with dignity. As the mayor of Budapest said: ‘Neither love nor freedom can be banned’ (5).

Ultimately, what is at stake is not just the outcome of a Pride parade, but Europe’s very ability to protect its meaning. If the EU cannot defend the right to peaceful assembly on its territory, then what remains of its treaties? As Amnesty International-Greece notes:

“The defence of fundamental rights must be translated into action. The European Commission must act quickly. […] It is time to break this deadlock. As defenders of human rights, we will continue to demand equality and fight for a life free of discrimination.” 

On the streets of Budapest, where celebrations are not allowed this year, mere existence becomes an act of political resistance. You don’t need to shout. Just walking down the street is enough.

LGBTQ+ Pride March across the Széchenyi Chain Bridge, Budapest, Hungary, June 2021

LGBTQ+ Pride March across the Széchenyi Chain Bridge, Budapest, Hungary, June 2021

References

1.Cseh, K. (2025, April 17). Viktor Orbán’s latest clampdown bans Budapest Pride – but he won’t stop us marching. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/17/viktor-orbans-latest-clampdown-bans-budapest-pride-but-he-wont-stop-us-marching

2.Fenyo, K., & Szakacs, G. (2025, April 1). Hungarians keep up protests against Orban’s move to ban Pride. Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarians-keep-up-protests-against-orbans-move-ban-pride-2025-04-01/

3.Kassam, A. (2025, March 18). Hungary bans Pride events and plans to use facial recognition to target attenders. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/18/hungary-bans-pride-events-and-plans-to-use-facial-recognition-to-target-attenders?

4.Komuves, A. (2025, June 19). Hungarian police ban Budapest Pride march, citing protection of children. Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/hungarian-police-ban-budapest-pride-march-2025-06-19/

5.Rankin, J. (2025, June 18). Dozens of MEPs to attend Budapest Pride in defiance of Viktor Orbán. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/18/meps-attend-budapest-pride-viktor-orban-hungary-lgbtq

6.Spike, J. (2025, March 17). A new anti-LGBTQ+ bill in Hungary would ban Pride event and allow use of facial recognition software. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/orban-government-ban-lgbtq-pride-hungary-d003f20c8444a8611c5cc9db08dc0352

7.Spike, J. (2025, April 15). Hungary passes constitutional amendment to ban LGBTQ+ public events, seen as a major blow to rights. Associated Press https://apnews.com/article/hungary-pride-ban-amendment-orban-gay-rights-lgbtq-155ec12cbbde7cc6be0f96adb323de77

8.The Associated Press. (2025, June 11). Hungarians declare resistance to Orbán’s government with a large protest. NPR.
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-5430267/hungary-viktor-orban-lgbtq-protest

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.