ICE in Europe: Security or Symbolic Power?
The agency’s influence is no longer confined to the United States. On January 27, ICE announced that its investigative arm, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), would support U.S. diplomatic security operations at the Milano-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics. The announcement quickly sparked political protests, as reports suggested ICE personnel could operate on Italian soil during the games.
Milan’s mayor, Giuseppe Sala, called ICE a “militia that kills” and criticized its methods, referencing the agency’s lethal actions in Minneapolis, including the recent deaths of Good and Pretti. Opposition parties in Italy warned that ICE could be given operational authority over security measures – a claim that inflamed public debate. Citizens staged protests, holding “ICE OUT” placards and chanting against the agency’s presence. Former Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte argued that Italy must “set its own boundaries” to prevent what he framed as U.S. overreach.
However, the reality of ICE’s involvement was far more limited. Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani clarified that HSI investigators would work strictly within U.S. diplomatic missions, providing analytical support and sharing intelligence with Italian authorities. They would not conduct arrests, enforce immigration law, or patrol Italian streets. Italy’s Secret Service, alongside local police, would retain exclusive responsibility for Olympic security. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem echoed these reassurances, emphasizing that HSI personnel “will not be operational agents like those assigned to immigration controls in the United States” and will only consult databases and assist with risk assessment.
Observers note that such arrangements are routine for international events with high-profile foreign delegations. For instance, during the 2024 Paris Olympics, foreign law enforcement personnel from 44 countries – including the U.S., Germany, and Qatar – assisted French authorities, without operational policing powers. The U.S. contribution included officers from federal agencies and K-9 units trained in explosive detection, illustrating a long-standing pattern of cross-border cooperation in high-profile events.
Despite the clarifications, public concern remains. Demonstrators argue that allowing ICE personnel into Europe – even in a limited advisory capacity – normalizes a model of enforcement widely criticized for lethal force and civil rights violations. A citizen-led petition in Germany calling for a ban on ICE agents traveling in the European Union has attracted over 300,000 signatures.