Across Europe, more and more people are finding out the hard way that holding a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) doesn’t always mean guaranteed medical help abroad. The promise of “equal access” to public healthcare can often turn out to be more illusion than reality.
European Health Insurance Card: a safety net or just a symbol?
A promising idea, complicated in practice
The EHIC is supposed to be your emergency safety net when travelling in the EU, EFTA countries, or the UK. In theory, it gives you access to necessary and urgent public healthcare under the same conditions as locals.
But the reality? It’s a lot more complicated. The card’s effectiveness depends on a range of factors, from service availability to major differences between national healthcare systems. What’s free in one country might come with a fee or co-payment in another — even for the exact same treatment.
Take this example: you injure your leg while hiking in the Austrian Alps. In Austria, you might be required to pay part of the treatment cost, even if it would be fully covered in your home country. These differences can lead to confusion — and unexpected bills — especially in emergency situations.
First pay, then hope for a refund
In many cases, using the EHIC means paying upfront and applying for reimbursement later — either on the spot through the local system or once you’re back home. While this sounds manageable in theory, in practice it’s often complicated by unclear procedures, exchange rate issues, and vague or missing information about what’s refundable and how much.
And in more serious cases, if you can’t access public healthcare, the EHIC becomes practically useless. It doesn’t cover private treatment or even certain procedures that, while urgent, are still classified as “planned.”
In contrast, private travel insurance — though commercial — often covers more, and more clearly. So, while the EHIC might offer symbolic reassurance, it’s no substitute for full coverage when it matters most.
Chronic conditions and the local doctor’s call
Things get even trickier for people with chronic illnesses, pregnant individuals, or anyone needing ongoing medical monitoring. While the EHIC technically includes urgent treatment for such cases, whether your condition counts as “urgent” depends on local medical judgment.
Imagine a person with diabetes vacationing in Greece who needs a new insulin prescription. If a local doctor doesn’t view this as an emergency, they might have to pay for it out of pocket.
The line between “necessary” and “planned” care is often blurred — and there’s no unified list of services guaranteed under the EHIC. Plus, if something goes wrong — if care is refused, for example — there’s no standard complaint process or EU-wide protection mechanism in place. That leaves patients in a vulnerable position.
A popular card with serious gaps
More than half of EU citizens hold an EHIC — an impressive number. Applying for one is usually quick, free, and easy. Temporary certificates are available too if your card hasn’t arrived before your trip.
But the popularity of the card doesn’t necessarily reflect how well it works.
Awareness about what the EHIC actually covers is low. Most campaigns focus on positive messages like “Travel with peace of mind” — but leave out the small print. That lack of knowledge often leads to bad decisions, extra costs, or legal misunderstandings. In the end, the card serves more as a political symbol than a solid guarantee of healthcare equality.
Not all EU citizens are equal when it comes to healthcare
The EHIC works best in countries with strong, accessible public healthcare systems. In places where public care is underfunded or partially privatized, the card offers much less real protection.
This creates a kind of health security hierarchy within the EU — where the same card gives you different outcomes depending on where you are. For a political union that promises equality, that’s a serious concern.
A symbol of integration – but lacking accountability
There’s no doubt the EHIC reflects a broader European ambition: to make mobility and solidarity real. But it’s only one piece of the puzzle. Without long-term policy changes to harmonize healthcare standards, its role will remain mostly symbolic.
There’s also no EU mechanism to regularly evaluate how well the EHIC works in each country. No penalties if care is wrongly refused. No clear appeal process for international patients. So what happens when the system fails?
In urgent, life-threatening situations, these system gaps can cause not just stress — but real danger.
Is the EHIC worth having?
Yes — but only if you understand its limits. The EHIC is a useful tool, especially for smaller, unexpected medical needs. But it’s not a catch-all solution, and definitely not a substitute for comprehensive travel insurance.
For young Europeans planning to work, study, or travel abroad, being informed is key. The card is a step towards a more unified Europe — but it still reflects the uneven playing field of national healthcare systems.
Until the EU addresses these deeper differences, the EHIC will remain a symbol of solidarity — not a guarantee of it.
Written by
Shape the conversation
Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.
©2025 Pulse Z. Design & developed by Matrix Internet Opens in a new tab