By turning gelatin, chitin, and chitosan from fish leftovers into nanofibers, the initiative is giving a whole new meaning to the circular economy – though it also raises questions about costs, scalability, and its real environmental impact.
Estonia’s fish industry finds a second life for waste
From fish heads to high-tech materials
The fishing and seafood industry generates huge amounts of waste every year: heads, tails, bones, and even wastewater. For companies operating year-round, this flow of waste never stops – and disposing of it is both difficult and expensive. But hidden inside these scraps are valuable compounds like gelatin, chitin, and chitosan. Traditionally, these biopolymers have been used in food, medicine, cosmetics, and even agriculture.
An Estonian science-and-industry consortium decided to take things further. Their ambitious goal was not only to recover these compounds but also to expand their uses. The result? Nanofibers that can be turned into wound dressings, leather-like fabrics, and even quirky business card holders made from fish gelatin fibers.
Science at the micro level
Extracting gelatin, chitin, and chitosan from fish waste required precise methods. Researchers from the Estonian University of Life Sciences developed advanced extraction techniques to ensure high quality, while scientists at the University of Tartu’s Institute of Pharmacy tested the properties of the recovered materials and their ability to form nanofibers.
The results were impressive: fish-gelatin dressings met strict pharmaceutical and medical standards and are now used in clinical applications through a spin-off company called EsaDres. At the same time, Gelatex Technologies OÜ created samples of innovative, leather-like fabrics made from fish gelatin.
Green innovation – but does it pay off?
The project is presented as a showcase for the circular economy in action. As Dr. Anu Kisand explains, local bio-waste – including fish remains – contains valuable biopolymers that can be turned into high-value products. Tests also confirmed that fish gelatin is still suitable for food products, giving it even more market potential.
But the big question remains: can this actually work on a large scale? Extracting biopolymers from fish waste might be more expensive than sourcing them traditionally. Logistics are another issue – fish waste is scattered across many locations and needs to be processed quickly to keep its value. Could the carbon footprint of transporting all this material cancel out the environmental benefits?
The promise and challenge of nanomaterials
The potential uses of fish-based nanofibers are exciting: medical dressings that help wounds heal, fashion items as alternatives to animal leather, and biodegradable industrial materials. But the nanomaterials market is tough. Strict safety standards, long-term testing, and certification processes slow down commercialization.
On top of that, competition is global. Similar projects are advancing in Asia and North America, where production costs are often lower. Estonia’s success will depend not only on its science but also on smart marketing and access to international markets.
Turning a problem into an opportunity
Fish waste is a challenge in many countries with large seafood industries. Disposing of it costs money and can pollute water and soil. Reusing it as a raw material reduces environmental pressure while creating new income opportunities for producers.
The Estonian project shows that even local resources can fuel innovation – if science, funding, and business come together. Still, scalability is the real test: can this technology spread across the EU, or will it remain a niche solution for regions with plenty of raw material?
From local experiment to European inspiration?
By bringing together fishermen, processors, researchers, and tech companies, Estonia has built an ecosystem where waste is no longer just a burden but a source of innovation. This model could inspire other sectors – like meat or seafood processing – to look for hidden value in what they usually throw away.
But to make such initiatives mainstream, the EU will need to adapt its legal frameworks, especially in waste management and biomedical safety. Otherwise, many promising projects could stall at the prototype stage – leaving much of the circular economy’s potential untapped.
Written by
Shape the conversation
Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.
©2025 Pulse Z. Design & developed by Matrix Internet Opens in a new tab