This judgment relates to the 2020 ruling of Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal, which effectively restricted access to abortion by banning it in cases of severe or fatal fetal impairment.

The complaint was submitted by A.R., a resident of Kraków, who used a template provided by the Federation for Women and Family Planning after the Constitutional Tribunal’s decision of 22 October 2020. She sought to terminate her pregnancy after doctors detected genetic disorders in the fetus.

According to the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling violated Article 8 of the Convention — the right to respect for private and family life.

Under Article 8, public authorities may interfere with this right only when it is lawful and strictly necessary in a democratic society for reasons such as national security, public safety, economic well-being, the protection of health or morals, or the rights and freedoms of others.

The Court noted that at the time of the ruling, the applicant was 15 weeks pregnant and medical tests confirmed genetic abnormalities in the fetus. She ultimately had the abortion in the Netherlands.

The judges found that the violation resulted from legal uncertainty between the moment the Constitutional Tribunal announced its ruling and the date it was officially published. During this period, no one knew whether abortions due to fetal abnormalities were still legal. This unpredictability was at the heart of the problem.

The 2020 Constitutional Tribunal Decision

On 22 October 2020, following a request from 104 MPs — mostly from the ruling Law and Justice party — the Constitutional Tribunal led by Julia Przyłębska concluded that performing an abortion in cases of fetal abnormalities was unconstitutional. However, the ruling was only published months later, on 27 January 2021, and only then entered into force.

The decision sparked massive nationwide protests, bringing thousands of people to the streets.

In January 2021, the Federation for Women and Family Planning published a pre-filled ECtHR application form, encouraging women of reproductive age in Poland to submit their cases to Strasbourg.

A.R. submitted the form, explaining that medical tests conducted on 5 November 2020 confirmed that the fetus had Edwards syndrome (trisomy 18).

She feared the ruling might be published before she could access a legal abortion in Poland, so she travelled to the Netherlands, where she underwent the procedure in a private clinic, the Court noted.

A Climate of Uncertainty

According to the Strasbourg Court, the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling created “significant legal uncertainty” around the legality of terminating pregnancies due to fetal abnormalities.

The judges emphasized that A.R. was directly affected by these changes. The lack of clarity made it impossible for her to make a lawful decision in Poland. As a result, she had no choice but to leave the country.

The ECtHR concluded that this situation amounted to an unlawful and unpredictable interference with her rights under Article 8 of the Convention.

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.