During the plenary, I also thought of Simone Veil, also an Auschwitz survivor, who became the first female President of the European Parliament in 1979.
In a 1995 speech to the European Parliament, on the 50th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, she warned:
“Nazism came through democratic channels,” Veil said. “I often thought that if Briand and Stresemann had been listened to, I would never have ended up in Auschwitz.”
She continued:
“There were things that, although obvious, we did not want to face between 1933 and 1940. By the time we took them seriously, it was too late, but we had known for a long time.”
She argued that Nazism arrived through democratic means because certain ideas were allowed to spread without being challenged early enough. She also described European integration as the most important political development of the previous fifty years, because it was meant to prevent a return to such crimes.
Her message was clear: we cannot by any means tolerate exclusion, racism and xenophobia.
Sitting in that hemicycle, I wondered if we, united by the European Union’s values, had learned anything at all.
Holocaust remembrance is often seen as a moral duty to commemorate the atrocities of the past. Today, I believe this is also a political responsibility. The same institution that honoured memory was also debating policies that affect human lives in real time.
In recent years, Parliament has passed resolutions on the war in Ukraine, condemning Russia’s full-scale invasion and expressing support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and for international law.
Moreover, Parliament also adopted resolutions on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, condemning the attacks by Hamas, calling for the release of hostages and for respect for international humanitarian law, while urging an immediate improvement in humanitarian access and supporting a two-state solution.
If “through the eyes of a child” is our lens, then it must apply consistently. If principles shift by ally, geography or political cost, it reads like double standards. “Never again” must be a standard, not a slogan.
“Every human life is the universe itself,” Noa said.
If we truly believe that, then remembrance must lead to action. Otherwise, “never again” becomes a commemorative slogan rather than a governing principle. Institutions are judged by what they do, not what they solemnly applaud.