Live

The agency is set to receive extra funding, new staff, and expanded authority to process biometric data and work more closely with other EU bodies. But will it be enough to make a real difference in fighting human trafficking and migrant smuggling?

A Major Step to Strengthen Europol

On 25 September, EU lawmakers reached a political agreement on strengthening Europol’s mandate. The proposal, first introduced by the European Commission in November 2023, aims to increase the agency’s ability to support national law enforcement authorities across the Union.

The reform will expand the European Centre for Combating Migrant Smuggling, enhancing its cooperation with Eurojust and Frontex. This should allow for more coordinated responses to cross-border crime. The plan also introduces new rules to make it easier for EU countries to share information with Europol — crucial in emergencies that require quick action.

Still, the key question remains: will these changes be enough to curb the growing scale of cross-border criminal networks? The most debated part of the reform is the agency’s new authority to process biometric data — fingerprints, facial recognition, and other personal identifiers. Supporters argue this will help identify suspects faster, but critics warn it could threaten privacy and fundamental rights.

More Money and Staff — But Is It Enough?

Under the reform, Europol will receive €50 million in additional funding and 50 new posts. This is a significant boost considering the growing pressure of migration and increasingly complex criminal networks.

However, experts caution that the scale of the problem far exceeds these resources. Smugglers and human traffickers operate through flexible, transnational networks, exploiting digital tools and legal loopholes. Without parallel investments in national coordination and intelligence sharing, critics argue, even a stronger Europol may remain more of a supporting actor than a decisive force.

Part of a Broader Security Strategy

This reform is not an isolated initiative — it’s part of the ProtectEU Internal Security Strategy, designed to strengthen Europe’s capacity to investigate complex cross-border crimes.

It also aligns with Ursula von der Leyen’s 2025 State of the Union address, where she proposed a system of sanctions targeting smugglers. These measures could include asset freezes, travel restrictions, and cutting off profits from illegal operations. The idea is to combine traditional law enforcement tools with financial and economic measures to make smuggling less profitable.

Legal Dilemmas and Privacy Concerns

The new powers will only take effect once formally approved by the European Parliament and the Council, and published in the Official Journal of the EU. Europol’s management board will then need to adopt detailed implementing rules — especially for the expanded anti-smuggling centre.

Yet the legal debate is far from over. How far can Europol’s mandate be stretched without infringing on civil liberties? The processing of biometric data is particularly sensitive. Critics warn that it could lead to mass surveillance of people crossing borders, including asylum seekers. If that happens, it could conflict with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

A Global Problem Requires Global Action

The expansion of Europol’s mandate fits into a wider international effort. In November 2023, the European Commission helped establish the Global Alliance Against Migrant Smuggling, aimed at strengthening cooperation with non-EU partners and dismantling the business model of criminal networks.

That’s crucial, because smuggling and human trafficking are global industries. Their networks stretch from North Africa and the Middle East to the Balkans and Western Europe. Combating them effectively requires not only EU-level tools, but also close coordination with countries of origin and transit.

Minimum Standards or Real Protection?

In parallel, the EU is negotiating a directive on preventing and combating the facilitation of irregular migration. Combined with Europol’s new powers, it is meant to build a more consistent framework for border security and criminal justice.

But doubts remain. Will these minimum standards work in practice? Or will member states adapt them to their own political priorities? Uneven implementation could leave some EU borders tightly controlled, while others remain weak spots for criminal groups.

The bottom line: strengthening Europol could be a turning point in Europe’s fight against human trafficking and migrant smuggling — but only if political ambition matches the complexity of the challenge. Balancing security, human rights, and solidarity will be the real test of Europe’s commitment to justice and unity.

Written by

Shape the conversation

Do you have anything to add to this story? Any ideas for interviews or angles we should explore? Let us know if you’d like to write a follow-up, a counterpoint, or share a similar story.

Write a counterargument article Write a related article