{"id":85878,"date":"2026-02-27T09:20:34","date_gmt":"2026-02-27T09:20:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/after-globalism-europe-the-united-states-and-the-reconfiguration-of-the-western-order-at-the-munich-security-conference\/"},"modified":"2026-02-27T09:20:54","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T09:20:54","slug":"dopo-il-globalismo-europa-stati-uniti-e-la-riconfigurazione-dellordine-occidentale-alla-conferenza-sulla-sicurezza-di-monaco","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/dopo-il-globalismo-europa-stati-uniti-e-la-riconfigurazione-dellordine-occidentale-alla-conferenza-sulla-sicurezza-di-monaco\/","title":{"rendered":"Dopo il globalismo? Europa, Stati Uniti e la riconfigurazione dell&#39;ordine occidentale alla Conferenza sulla sicurezza di Monaco"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 2026 Munich Security Report, titled \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/securityconference.org\/assets\/02_Dokumente\/01_Publikationen\/2026\/MSR2026\/Under_Destruction%E2%80%93Munich_Security_Report_2026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under Destruction,<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d shows a transformation of the international order. The title itself signals the erosion of the political, economic, and security architecture that was established after World War II, an order largely designed and led by the United States. For decades, Washington was seen as the cornerstone of the transatlantic alliance and the guarantor of a liberal, rules-based system. In the economic sphere, this order was first structured under the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wto.org\/english\/docs_e\/legal_e\/gatt47_e.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and later institutionalized through the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wto.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">World Trade Organization (WTO)<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It was grounded in principles such as non-discrimination, transparency, and binding commitments. The underlying idea was \u201cdiffuse reciprocity\u201d: even if gains were not perfectly balanced in the short term, all participating countries were expected to benefit fairly over time. However, recent developments suggest that this foundation is weakening.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At the 56th World Economic Forum in Davos, discussions <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/stories\/2026\/01\/rupture-can-the-past-help-us-see-what-comes-next\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">reportedly centered<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on the collapse of the post-1945 economic system, with growing acknowledgment that the United States can no longer be automatically regarded as a fully \u201creliable ally.\u201d\u00a0 The United States has made clear that it does not want a weak Europe; rather, it expects a stronger, more capable partner. At the same time, European leaders increasingly emphasize the need for strategic autonomy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At the same time, this can also be seen as an American demand directed at European countries. During the 2025 Munich Security Conference, tensions were particularly high due to a strong right-leaning stance from the United States. Just one week before Germany\u2019s national elections, U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivered a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/securityconference.org\/assets\/user_upload\/MSC_Speeches_2025_Vol2_Ansicht.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">speech<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> addressing mass migration, arguing that Germany was facing serious immigration problems. His positioning appeared to signal support for Germany\u2019s far-right party (Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland (AfD)). He also described migration as the greatest threat currently confronting Europe, even more significant than Russian aggression.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During this year\u2019s conference, Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed the same issue. He <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.state.gov\/releases\/office-of-the-spokesperson\/2026\/02\/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-at-the-munich-security-conference\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">mentioned<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that the United States and the European Union share a common cultural heritage and religious heritage that must be safeguarded through tighter migration control. Rubio framed the debate around the protection of what he described as the \u201ccivilization\u201d shaped within European societies. By presenting cultural identity as something that requires protection with a migration control, he echoed a political narrative that casts migration as a civilizational threat.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">He also argues that the post-Cold War period placed excessive confidence in globalism, assuming that economic openness and institutional cooperation would automatically produce fairness among states. In his view, this expectation proved unrealistic, which is why he insists that allies should not \u201crationalize the broken status quo rather than reckon with what is necessary to fix it.\u201d He further emphasized that the United States has \u201cno interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West\u2019s managed decline.\u201d From this perspective, Europe is encouraged to move away from unquestioned faith in global integration and instead emphasize sovereignty, stronger national positioning, and protection of what he describes as Western cultural foundations. In this context, globalism is not considered to be the unifying and stabilizing outcome of the post-Cold War period but rather something that may have diminished its power.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The new European security strategy<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Globalization continues to expand, but not necessarily in the form or direction envisioned by the United States. Rather than reinforcing a U.S.-led liberal order, recent developments suggest a diversification of power in which Europe occupies an increasingly decisive role. Peter Leibinger, President of the Federation of German Industries (BDI), stated during discussions held in Munich alongside the Munich Security Conference that Europe must be prepared to shape its defense policy \u201cwith, without, and if necessary, against Washington.\u201d Delivered in the context of debates on European industrial and security strategy. The remark signals a shift in European thinking: the era of unquestioned reliance on American security guarantees appears to be ending.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Also, The French Minister of Defense, Catherine, shared her views during the European E5 Defense Ministers meeting on February 20, 2026. She stated: \u201cWe must move toward a more European NATO.\u201d While recognizing the United States as an important ally, she also noted that Washington has encouraged European nations \u201cto take greater responsibility for our own defense.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Europe\u2019s position became clearer in the remarks delivered by Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, at the Munich Conference. She expresses that Europe must strengthen its own defense capabilities and assume greater responsibility for its security. Discussions also centered on reinforcing Europe\u2019s deterrence strategy, particularly through nuclear policy and the possible expansion of the French-led nuclear umbrella.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, this shift should not be overstated. Despite growing calls for strategic autonomy, Europe remains structurally dependent on NATO and, by extension, the United States in matters of collective defense and broader security coordination.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Europe\u2019s Economic Response to Trade Tensions with the United States<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Europe\u2019s pursuit of strategic autonomy is not limited to defense; it is also visible in economic policy. Following the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected President Donald Trump\u2019s global tariff policy, and Washington\u2019s immediate announcement of new broad tariffs on 20 February 2026, the European Commission <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/commission\/presscorner\/detail\/en\/statement_26_450\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">made clear<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> immediately, on 22 February 2026, that it will not accept any increase in tariffs imposed by the United States that contradicts the EU\u2013U.S. trade agreement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The European Commission demanded full clarity from Washington regarding its next steps and insisted that previously negotiated commitments must be respected. It warned that unpredictable tariff policies risk disrupting trade flows and undermining confidence in global markets. The repeated uncertainty regarding America&#8217;s tariff policy will further strengthen European partnerships and internal industrial capacity. The European approach to security is best exemplified by its approach to its economic policy, which prioritizes security in an uncertain and unstable world rather than abandoning partnerships and cooperation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the end, the European approach to America&#8217;s tariff policy best exemplifies how economic policy and international relations are no longer separate but rather how economic policy has become synonymous with international strategy. The weakening of the rules-based order does not signal the end of globalization but rather its evolution to a more contested and negotiated process with Europe seeking to be independent and to be involved.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_85858\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-85858\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-85858\" src=\"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/istockphoto-1404149531-1024x1024-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/istockphoto-1404149531-1024x1024-1.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/istockphoto-1404149531-1024x1024-1-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-85858\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">USA and EU flags with blue sky. waving blue sky<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 2026 Munich Security Report, titled \u201cUnder Destruction,\u201d shows a transformation of the international order. The title itself signals the erosion of the political, economic, and security architecture that was established after World War II, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1626,"featured_media":85862,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[682,568],"tags":[1300,1957,25065,25066,25067,8020,25068,16768],"post_formats":[626],"coauthors":[21851],"class_list":["post-85878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-attualita","category-generale","tag-defense-it","tag-europe-it","tag-globalism","tag-msc","tag-munich","tag-security-it","tag-strong-europe","tag-united-states-it","post_formats-articoli"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1626"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85878"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85878\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85885,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85878\/revisions\/85885"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85878"},{"taxonomy":"post_formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_formats?post=85878"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pulse-z.eu\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=85878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}